Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:3209617rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3209617lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0086418lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3209617lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0042449lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3209617lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0041637lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3209617lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1579762lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3209617lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0009491lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3209617lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0190932lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3209617lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205349lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3209617pubmed:issue6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3209617pubmed:dateCreated1989-2-22lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3209617pubmed:abstractTextThis study is based on 223 consecutive femoro-popliteal and femorotibial bypass grafts performed between January 1978 and June 1985 at the Western General Hospital. Autogenous vein grafts demonstrated better 5 year patency rates (54%) than modified human umbilical vein (32%). The superiority of autogenous vein was even more marked when anastomoses were to below knee vessels: 56% compared with 26% at 5 years. Grafts anastomosed to the superficial femoral artery had similar long term patency to those anastomosed to the common femoral artery. When grafts were required for severe ischaemia, similar 5 year patency rates were achieved with autogenous vein (35%) and modified human umbilical vein (30%). The 5 year limb salvage rate in severe ischaemia was 72% for autogenous vein and 63% for modified human umbilical vein. The findings confirm that modified human umbilical vein is a satisfactory alternative when autogenous vein is not available.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3209617pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3209617pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3209617pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3209617pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3209617pubmed:issn0021-9509lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3209617pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KindR ERElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3209617pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DevineT JTJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3209617pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FellGGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3209617pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ParkerH JHJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3209617pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3209617pubmed:volume29lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3209617pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3209617pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3209617pubmed:pagination727-32lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3209617pubmed:dateRevised2009-11-11lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3209617pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3209617-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3209617pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3209617-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3209617pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3209617-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3209617pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3209617-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3209617pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3209617-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3209617pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3209617-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3209617pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3209617-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3209617pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3209617-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3209617pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3209617-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3209617pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3209617-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3209617pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3209617-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3209617pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3209617-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3209617pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3209617-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3209617pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3209617-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3209617pubmed:articleTitleFemoropopliteal bypass using autogenous vein and modified human umbilical vein. A comparative study.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3209617pubmed:affiliationWestern General Hospital Vascular Unit, Melbourne, Australia.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3209617pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3209617pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed