| pubmed-article:3170421 | pubmed:abstractText | We compared the rate of relaxation of the diaphragm (RRdi) after unilateral phrenic nerve stimulation, bilateral phrenic nerve stimulations, and short sharp voluntary contractions (sniffs). RRdi was measured as the maximum rate of decline in transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) corrected for the change in Pdi [maximum relaxation rate (MRR)/delta Pdi], the time constant (tau) of the later exponential decline in Pdi, and the time to half relaxation (1/2 RT). In five subjects there was no difference in mean RRdi apart from a smaller MRR/delta Pdi (P less than 0.05) for left unilateral compared with either right unilateral or bilateral needle stimulation. However, RRdi varied unpredictably between unilateral and bilateral stimulation of the phrenic nerve in individual subjects. In the same five subjects, sniffs were found to have a slower RRdi than bilateral stimulations (MRR/delta Pdi 0.0064 +/- 0.0007 vs. 0.0074 +/- 0.0018/ms, tau 57.2 +/- 8.7 vs. 48.2 +/- 7.4 ms, 1/2 RT 108.9 +/- 10.9 vs. 73.9 +/- 6.0 ms; all P less than 0.05). The application and inflation of an abdominal binder to an external pressure of 60 mmHg resulted in a decrease in functional residual capacity (-710 +/- 70 ml), but there was no effect on relaxation parameters. Our findings suggest that in the evaluation of RRdi 1) unilateral hemidiaphragmatic stimulations may not accurately reflect the in vivo contractile properties of the diaphragm, 2) sniff maneuvers are not voluntary equivalents of phrenic nerve stimulations, and 3) RRdi is not affected by abdominal binder inflation up to 60 mmHg. | lld:pubmed |
