Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:3057592rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3057592lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0239806lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3057592lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0026447lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3057592lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0043272lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3057592lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1527148lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3057592lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0204695lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3057592lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0243144lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3057592lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0322859lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3057592lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0322806lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3057592pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3057592pubmed:dateCreated1989-1-10lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3057592pubmed:abstractTextColonized mosquitoes of Culex quinquefasciatus (Haitian strain) and Aedes aegypti (Liverpool strain) were blood fed on a patas monkey (Erythrocebus patas) that had been experimentally infected with the Haitian strain of Wuchereria bancrofti and harbored a consistently low microfilaremia (1-3 mf per 20 mm3). Both species ingested more than twice the expected number of microfilariae (mf), i.e. 1.9 and 0.77 mf per mosquito, respectively. However, at 10-16 hours post ingestion only 4.2% of the mf had migrated from the blood meal in Cx. quinquefasciatus versus 20.7% in Ae. aegypti. Subsequently, only 3.5% of the ingested mf developed to the third stage in Cx. quinquefasciatus versus 56% in Ae. aegypti.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3057592pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3057592pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3057592pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3057592pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3057592pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3057592pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3057592pubmed:monthSeplld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3057592pubmed:issn0177-2392lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3057592pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LowrieR CRCJrlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3057592pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LowichikAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3057592pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3057592pubmed:volume39lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3057592pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3057592pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3057592pubmed:pagination227-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3057592pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3057592pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3057592-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3057592pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3057592-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3057592pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3057592-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3057592pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3057592-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3057592pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3057592-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3057592pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3057592-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3057592pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3057592-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3057592pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3057592-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3057592pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3057592-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3057592pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3057592-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3057592pubmed:year1988lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3057592pubmed:articleTitleUptake and development of Wuchereria bancrofti in Aedes aegypti and Haitian Culex quinquefasciatus that were fed on a monkey with low-density microfilaremia.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3057592pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Parasitology, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3057592pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3057592pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3057592pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.lld:pubmed