Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:2919559rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2919559lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0028263lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2919559lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0013798lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2919559lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2349179lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2919559lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0301630lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2919559lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0936012lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2919559pubmed:issue9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2919559pubmed:dateCreated1989-3-30lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2919559pubmed:abstractTextReduction of random noise by signal averaging is required to uncover ventricular late potentials (LPs). Noise reduction is dependent upon the ambient noise before the study and the number of signal-averaged QRS complexes. Prior studies have used a fixed number of QRS complexes (e.g., 150 to 200) for performing signal-averaged electrocardiograms (SAECGs). Because of variable background noise levels, it was hypothesized that variable noise levels after processing could interfere with detection of LP. Accordingly, SAECGs were performed for each patient to 2 prespecified noise endpoints (expressed as the standard deviation/square root of number of beats): 1.0 microV, which has been used previously as a minimal residual noise level, and 0.3 microV, a low level that generally can be attained in less than 450 beats. Root mean square-voltage noises in the 40-Hz high pass filtered vector magnitude for these studies were 1.36 +/- 0.57 and 0.58 +/- 0.28 microV, respectively. The relative prevalence of LP was evaluated in 3 groups. Group I was comprised of 26 patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias, group II included 59 patients after myocardial infarction and group III had 14 normal volunteers. The prevalence of LP was greater in group I (69 vs 46%, p less than 0.001) and group II (34 vs 24%, p less than 0.01) with the 0.3-microV studies. In group III, the prevalence did not change (7 vs 7%, difference not significant). The greater detection of LP was due to improved resolution of the terminal low-amplitude QRS segment. Therefore, using the 0.3 microV level instead of 1.0 microV increased sensitivity of LP without loss of specificity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2919559pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2919559pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2919559pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2919559pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2919559pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2919559pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2919559pubmed:monthMarlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2919559pubmed:issn0002-9149lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2919559pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BiggerJ TJTJrlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2919559pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SteinbergJ...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2919559pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2919559pubmed:day1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2919559pubmed:volume63lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2919559pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2919559pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2919559pubmed:pagination556-60lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2919559pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2919559pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2919559-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2919559pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2919559-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2919559pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2919559-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2919559pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2919559-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2919559pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2919559-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2919559pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2919559-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2919559pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2919559-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2919559pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2919559-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2919559pubmed:year1989lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2919559pubmed:articleTitleImportance of the endpoint of noise reduction in analysis of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2919559pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York 10032.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2919559pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2919559pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2919559pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2919559pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:2919559lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:2919559lld:pubmed