| pubmed-article:2867316 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:2867316 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0025663 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:2867316 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1274040 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:2867316 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1707455 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:2867316 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0559477 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:2867316 | pubmed:issue | 8472 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:2867316 | pubmed:dateCreated | 1986-2-14 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:2867316 | pubmed:abstractText | In a follow-up study of 122 full-term infants in whom postasphyxial encephalopathy occurred the incidence of death or severe handicap was 1 in 1000 deliveries. The abilities of two methods of diagnosing intrapartum asphyxia to predict outcome at a median age of 2.5 years were compared. A decision matrix calculation was undertaken to assess the sensitivity and specificity of low Apgar score and postasphyxial encephalopathy. A 10 min Apgar score less than or equal to 5 was the most sensitive of six different Apgar ratings in predicting adverse outcome (sensitivity 43%, specificity 95%) but even this was much less sensitive than the presence of moderate or severe encephalopathy in predicting death or severe handicap (sensitivity 96%). | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:2867316 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:2867316 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:2867316 | pubmed:citationSubset | AIM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:2867316 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:2867316 | pubmed:month | Jan | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:2867316 | pubmed:issn | 0140-6736 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:2867316 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:SandeMM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:2867316 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:LeveneM IMI | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:2867316 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:MooreJ RJR | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:2867316 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:GrindulisHH | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:2867316 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:2867316 | pubmed:day | 11 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:2867316 | pubmed:volume | 1 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:2867316 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:2867316 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:2867316 | pubmed:pagination | 67-9 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:2867316 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2007-11-15 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:2867316 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2867316-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:2867316 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2867316-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:2867316 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2867316-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:2867316 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2867316-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:2867316 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2867316-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:2867316 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2867316-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:2867316 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2867316-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:2867316 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2867316-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:2867316 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2867316-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:2867316 | pubmed:year | 1986 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:2867316 | pubmed:articleTitle | Comparison of two methods of predicting outcome in perinatal asphyxia. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:2867316 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:2867316 | pubmed:publicationType | Clinical Trial | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:2867316 | pubmed:publicationType | Comparative Study | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:2867316 | pubmed:publicationType | Controlled Clinical Trial | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:2867316 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:2867316 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:2867316 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:2867316 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:2867316 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:2867316 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:2867316 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:2867316 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:2867316 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:2867316 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:2867316 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:2867316 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:2867316 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:2867316 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:2867316 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:2867316 | lld:pubmed |
