Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:2676025rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2676025lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0015325lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2676025lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0079706lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2676025pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2676025pubmed:dateCreated1989-11-16lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2676025pubmed:abstractTextThe work of forensic psychiatrists has expanded into the controversial area of cases involving new religious movements. Challenges to the expert witness in such cases include new questions and a large body of relevant literature. Published appeals decisions have appeared with judicial comments on the conduct of the involved experts. This article presents the comments about expert witnesses from judges who decided cases involving the major new issues of coercion both in recruitment into and forcible abduction from cults, and competency to join and make donations to these groups. The judicial comments are evaluated using relevant literature from the fields of law, psychiatry, and religion. This provides a basis for general observations and suggestions regarding the involvement of psychiatric experts in cult-related cases.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2676025pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2676025pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2676025pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2676025pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2676025pubmed:issn0091-634Xlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2676025pubmed:authorpubmed-author:YoungJ LJLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2676025pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GriffithE EEElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2676025pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2676025pubmed:volume17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2676025pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2676025pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2676025pubmed:pagination257-67lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2676025pubmed:dateRevised2004-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2676025pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2676025-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2676025pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2676025-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2676025pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2676025-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2676025pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2676025-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2676025pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2676025-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2676025pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2676025-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2676025pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2676025-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2676025pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2676025-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2676025pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2676025-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2676025pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2676025-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2676025pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2676025-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2676025pubmed:year1989lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2676025pubmed:articleTitleExpert testimony in cult-related litigation.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2676025pubmed:affiliationTransitional Treatment Unit, Whiting Forensic Institute, Middletown, Connecticut.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2676025pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2676025pubmed:publicationTypeReviewlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2676025pubmed:publicationTypeCase Reportslld:pubmed