Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:2667630rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2667630lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0021270lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2667630lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0220908lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2667630lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0162481lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2667630lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2349101lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2667630pubmed:issue5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2667630pubmed:dateCreated1989-9-11lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2667630pubmed:abstractTextA prospective blind study assessed the efficacy of Doppler examination of the umbilical arteries (pulsatility index) as a screening procedure for predicting small-for-gestational-age and low-weight-for-length (low ponderal index) infants. Birthweight below the 2.3rd and 10th centile and ponderal index below the 3rd and 10th centile were chosen as 'cut-off' levels. Of pregnant women from our university hospital population, 400 were examined at 28 and 34 weeks gestation. The sensitivity of the test was low, ranging from 16.9 to 41.7% for the different indices. The predictive value of a negative screening test also was unsatisfactory, ranging from 79.6% to 97.9%. It is concluded that a single umbilical artery Doppler examination at 28 or 34 weeks does not satisfy the need in obstetrics for a simple and accurate technique to screen for small-for-gestational-age and low-weight-for-length infants in an unselected obstetric population.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2667630pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2667630pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2667630pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2667630pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2667630pubmed:monthMaylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2667630pubmed:issn0306-5456lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2667630pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BruinseH WHWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2667630pubmed:authorpubmed-author:van BeekEElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2667630pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ReuwerP JPJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2667630pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SijmonsE AEAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2667630pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2667630pubmed:volume96lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2667630pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2667630pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2667630pubmed:pagination557-61lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2667630pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2667630pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2667630-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2667630pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2667630-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2667630pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2667630-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2667630pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2667630-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2667630pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2667630-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2667630pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2667630-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2667630pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2667630-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2667630pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2667630-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2667630pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2667630-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2667630pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2667630-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2667630pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2667630-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2667630pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2667630-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2667630pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2667630-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2667630pubmed:year1989lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2667630pubmed:articleTitleThe validity of screening for small-for-gestational-age and low-weight-for-length infants by Doppler ultrasound.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2667630pubmed:affiliationDept of Obstetrics, University Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2667630pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2667630pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed