Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:2651701rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0032961lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2651701lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0042149lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2651701lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0228174lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2651701lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0041638lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2651701lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0683598lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2651701lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0598596lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:dateCreated1989-6-2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:abstractTextThe purpose of this study is to assess alterations in vascular resistance as measured by Doppler ultrasound in the postterm fetus. Forty-five postterm patients (greater than or equal to 287 days gestation by "good" dates) underwent Doppler velocimetry and calculation of systolic to diastolic (S/D) ratios of the umbilical, internal carotid, and uterine artery waveforms within 7 days of delivery. Patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 consisted of 26 patients with normal antepartum fetal surveillance that included reactive nonstress test and an amniotic fluid index (using the four-quadrant technique) equal to or greater than 5 cm. Group 2 consisted of 19 patients with antepartum compromise on the antepartum fetal surveillance tests. There was significantly greater (p less than .05) morbidity in group 2 compared to group 1 as judged by cesarean section for fetal distress (47% vs 15%), meconium at delivery (53% vs 4%), and 5-minute Apgar score less than 7 (30% vs 4%). There were no significant differences in the umbilical and uterine artery S/D ratios in the two groups, although patients in group 2 had significantly lower cerebral S/D ratios (3.6 +/- .5) compared to group 1 (4.4 +/- 0.4) (p less than .05). The ratio of cerebral to placental (umbilical) resistance in group 2 was significantly lower (1.1 +/- .3) compared to group 1 (1.8 +/- .3) (p less than .05). There was a low incidence of abnormal umbilical (greater than 3) and uterine (greater than 2.6) S/D ratios in both groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:monthAprlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:issn0278-4297lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PaulR HRHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PlattL DLDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PhelanJ PJPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MedearisA LALlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HorensteinJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BrarH SHSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:volume8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:pagination187-91lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2651701-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2651701-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2651701-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2651701-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2651701-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2651701-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2651701-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2651701-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2651701-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2651701-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2651701-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2651701-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2651701-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2651701-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2651701-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:year1989lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:articleTitleCerebral, umbilical, and uterine resistance using Doppler velocimetry in postterm pregnancy.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2651701pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:2651701lld:pubmed