Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:2644719rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0008320lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2644719lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0231921lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2644719lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0332206lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:issue2 Pt 1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:dateCreated1989-3-23lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:abstractTextSixty-six patients undergoing cholecystectomy were randomly allocated to receive either intercostal blockade with bupivacaine supplemented with papaveretum or papaveretum alone for postoperative analgesia. Both groups were similar regarding distribution of sex, age, and weight. These two groups were compared. Patients who did not have intercostal blockade required postoperative analgesia sooner. There was no significant difference, however, in the total consumption of papaveretum. Both groups experienced similar degrees of pain, and there were no differences in postoperative pulmonary function. We conclude that although single intercostal blockade is an effective analgesic, it does not improve pain relief and does not improve pulmonary function after cholecystectomy when compared with a regimen of on-demand, intramuscularly administered papaveretum.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:monthFeblld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:issn0039-6060lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WymanAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LeongY PYPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RossW BWBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SmithersB MBMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TweedieJ HJHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:volume105lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:pagination166-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2644719-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2644719-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2644719-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2644719-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2644719-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2644719-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2644719-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2644719-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2644719-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2644719-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2644719-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2644719-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2644719-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2644719-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2644719-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2644719-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2644719-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2644719-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2644719-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:year1989lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:articleTitleIntercostal blockade and pulmonary function after cholecystectomy.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Surgery, Derbyshire Royal Infirmary, England.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2644719pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed