Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:2638926rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2638926lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1280500lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2638926lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0012751lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2638926lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1705241lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2638926lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205344lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2638926lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1705242lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2638926pubmed:issue11lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2638926pubmed:dateCreated1990-8-13lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2638926pubmed:abstractText1. Using a 0.9 x 4.0 m visual alley, perceived absolute distance was studied in four groups of subjects: binocular, cross-eyed, monocular, and induced-monocular individuals. 2. A power function between the different physical and perceived distances was adjusted and the relative and absolute errors made by the observers were calculated. Despite a tendency to overestimate distance in the monocular group, no significant differences were detected among groups. 3. The data suggest that, under natural-cue conditions, binocularity is not a determining factor for the perception of absolute distance.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2638926pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2638926pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2638926pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2638926pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2638926pubmed:issn0100-879Xlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2638926pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SchorPPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2638926pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FukusimaS SSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2638926pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CruzA AAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2638926pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Da-SilvaJ AJAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2638926pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2638926pubmed:volume22lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2638926pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2638926pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2638926pubmed:pagination1355-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2638926pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2638926pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2638926-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2638926pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2638926-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2638926pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2638926-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2638926pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2638926-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2638926pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2638926-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2638926pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2638926-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2638926pubmed:year1989lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2638926pubmed:articleTitleEffect of differences in binocularity on perceived absolute distance.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2638926pubmed:affiliationDepartamento de Oftalmologia e Otorrinolaringologia, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brasil.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2638926pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2638926pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed