Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:2520621rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0677659lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2520621lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0014869lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2520621lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0034665lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2520621lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0520010lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2520621lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0206012lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:dateCreated1992-6-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:abstractTextH2-receptor antagonists administered in conventional dosage regimens fail to heal a significant proportion of patients with moderate or severe reflux oesophagitis. We have compared the effects of a higher dose of ranitidine (300 mg q.d.s.) with the currently recommended dosage regimen (150 mg b.d.) in 138 patients suffering from reflux oesophagitis. After 4 weeks of treatment 29% of patients who received 150 mg ranitidine b.d., and 63% of patients who received 300 mg ranitidine q.d.s. had complete endoscopic healing of their lesions (P less than 0.0001). After 8 weeks these proportions had increased to 54% and 75%, respectively (P less than 0.01). After 4 weeks of treatment, compete symptomatic relief had been achieved in 46% of patients who received 150 mg ranitidine b.d. and in 67% of patients who received 300 mg ranitidine q.d.s. (P less than 0.05). After 8 weeks these proportions were 64% and 84%, respectively (P less than 0.05). Both dosage schedules were well-tolerated. We conclude that more rapid symptom relief and healing in reflux oesophagitis can be achieved with 300 mg ranitidine q.d.s. than with 150 mg ranitidine b.d.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:monthJunlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:issn0269-2813lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MillsJ GJGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WoodJ RJRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:authorpubmed-author:JohnsonN JNJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BoydE JEJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:volume3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:pagination259-66lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2520621-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2520621-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2520621-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2520621-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2520621-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2520621-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2520621-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2520621-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2520621-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2520621-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2520621-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2520621-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2520621-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:year1989lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:articleTitleAcute treatment of reflux oesophagitis: a multicentre trial to compare 150 mg ranitidine b.d. with 300 mg ranitidine q.d.s.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Gastroenterology, Glaxo Group Research Ltd, Greenford, Middlesex, UK.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2520621pubmed:publicationTypeMulticenter Studylld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:2520621lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:2520621lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:2520621lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:2520621lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:2520621lld:pubmed