Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:2394002rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1257890lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2394002lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0936044lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2394002lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0155626lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2394002lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0854571lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2394002lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0035124lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2394002lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2603343lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2394002lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0686907lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:dateCreated1990-10-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:abstractTextTo determine the clinical consequences of reocclusion of an infarct-related artery after reperfusion therapy, we evaluated 810 patients with acute myocardial infarction. Patients were admitted into four sequential studies with similar entry criteria in which patency of the infarct-related artery was assessed by coronary arteriography 90 minutes after onset of thrombolytic therapy. Successful reperfusion was established acutely in 733 patients. Thrombolytic therapy included tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) in 517, urokinase in 87, and a combination of t-PA and urokinase in 129 patients. All patients received aspirin, intravenous heparin and nitroglycerin, and diltiazem during the recovery phase. A repeat coronary arteriogram was performed in 88% of patients at a median of 7 days after the onset of symptoms. Reocclusion of the infarct-related artery occurred in 91 patients (12.4%), and 58% of these were symptomatic. Angiographic characteristics at 90 minutes after thrombolytic therapy that were associated with reocclusion compared with sustained coronary artery patency were right coronary infarct-related artery (65% versus 44%, respectively) and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow 0 or 1 (21% versus 10%, respectively) before further intervention. Median (interquartile value) degree of stenosis in the infarct-related artery at 90 minutes was similar between groups: 99% for reoccluded (value, 90/100%) compared with 95% for patent (value, 80/99%). Patients with reocclusion had similar left ventricular ejection fractions compared with patients with sustained patency at follow-up. However, patients with reocclusion at follow-up had worse infarct-zone function at -2.7 (value, -3.2/-1.8) versus -2.4 (SD/chord) (value, -3.1/-1.3) (p = 0.016). The recovery of both global and infarct-zone function was impaired by reocclusion of the infarct-related artery compared with maintained patency; median delta ejection fraction was -2 compared with 1 (p = 0.006) and median delta infarct-zone wall motion was -0.10 compared with 0.34 SD/chord (p = 0.011), respectively. In addition, patients with reocclusion had more complicated hospital courses and higher in-hospital mortality rates (11.0% versus 4.5%, respectively; p = 0.01). We conclude that reocclusion of the infarct-related artery after successful reperfusion is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality rates. Reocclusion is also detrimental to the functional recovery of both global and infarct-zone regional left ventricular function. Thus, new strategies in the postinfarction period need to be developed to prevent reocclusion of the infarct-related artery.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:monthSeplld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:issn0009-7322lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:authorpubmed-author:EllisSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CaliffR MRMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GeorgeBBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:authorpubmed-author:OhmanE MEMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TopolE JEJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:authorpubmed-author:StackRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SigmonK NKNlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CandelaRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AbbottsmithCClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KereiakesDDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:volume82lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:pagination781-91lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:dateRevised2010-11-18lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2394002-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2394002-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2394002-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2394002-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2394002-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2394002-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2394002-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2394002-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2394002-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:year1990lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:articleTitleConsequences of reocclusion after successful reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction. TAMI Study Group.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2394002pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:2394002lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:2394002lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:2394002lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:2394002lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:2394002lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:2394002lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:2394002lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:2394002lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:2394002lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:2394002lld:pubmed