Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:2392272rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2392272lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0008972lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2392272lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0009758lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2392272lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0009766lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2392272lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1522483lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2392272lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0022885lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2392272lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0392366lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2392272lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0750491lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2392272pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2392272pubmed:dateCreated1990-10-2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2392272pubmed:abstractTextWe examined 57 patients who showed conjunctivitis suspected of allergic pathogenesis with skin radioallergosorbent (RAST) and conjunctival provocation tests (CPT). Our aim was to define statistical correlations between those tests and their exact values for the right diagnosis. Our data show that CPT is more sensitive than skin tests or RAST to ascertain the origin of conjunctivitis.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2392272pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2392272pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2392272pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2392272pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2392272pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2392272pubmed:issn0030-3755lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2392272pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GiovanniniMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2392272pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SpadaEElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2392272pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BroccoliM PMPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2392272pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2392272pubmed:volume201lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2392272pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2392272pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2392272pubmed:pagination1-4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2392272pubmed:dateRevised2007-9-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2392272pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2392272-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2392272pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2392272-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2392272pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2392272-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2392272pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2392272-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2392272pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2392272-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2392272pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2392272-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2392272pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2392272-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2392272pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2392272-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2392272pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2392272-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2392272pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2392272-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2392272pubmed:year1990lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2392272pubmed:articleTitleConjunctival provocation tests in suspected allergic conjunctivitis: a clinical study.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2392272pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Pulmonary and Allergic Diseases, Conselice Hospital, Lugo, Italy.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2392272pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2392272pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed