Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:2385113rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0374711lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2385113lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1186983lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2385113lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0043240lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2385113lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0026269lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2385113lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0175895lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2385113lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2385113lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0559956lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2385113lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1705181lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:dateCreated1990-9-14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:abstractTextFrom January 1978 to December 1987 we operated on 135 patients with calcified mitral stenosis. In 60 patients a conservative operation was performed (group I). Nine patients required mitral annuloplasty associated with the commissurotomy. The other 75 patients underwent mitral valve replacement (group II). In 37 patients a mechanical prosthesis was used and in 38 a biologic one. The patients given mitral valve replacement had a more heavily calcified valve than those undergoing a conservative procedure. Twenty-one patients (12 from group I and 13 from group II) required associated tricuspid annuloplasty. The mean follow-up time was 69.1 months (1 months to 10 years). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of operative death (0% and 4%, respectively), postoperative functional class, actuarial survival rate at 10 years (84% and 96%, respectively), and probability of freedom from thromboemboli at 10 years (98% and 96%, respectively). However, the probability of freedom from reoperation at 10 years significantly favored the conservative surgery group (84% and 69%, respectively, p less than 0.01). Finally, the probability of freedom from complications at 10 years was also significantly higher in the conservative surgery group (82% and 64%, respectively, p less than 0.005). Because of these results we believe that conservative surgery is, at present, a better alternative than mitral valve replacement for patients with partially calcified mitral stenosis.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:monthAuglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:issn0022-5223lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MonteroAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ConchaMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:authorpubmed-author:EguarasM GMGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RománMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CallejaFFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LuqueIIlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GarcíaM AMAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:authorpubmed-author:OcerínJ MJMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:volume100lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:pagination161-6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2385113-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2385113-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2385113-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2385113-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2385113-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2385113-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2385113-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2385113-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2385113-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2385113-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2385113-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2385113-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2385113-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2385113-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2385113-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:year1990lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:articleTitleA comparison of repair and replacement for mitral stenosis with partially calcified valve.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:affiliationService of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital Reina Sofia, University of Cordoba, Spain.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2385113pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:2385113lld:pubmed