Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:2344313rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2344313lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0008633lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2344313lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0010819lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2344313lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205160lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2344313lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2603343lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2344313lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0936012lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2344313lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205237lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2344313pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2344313pubmed:dateCreated1990-6-25lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2344313pubmed:abstractTextForty-two cases of pre-invasive and invasive cancer of the cervix diagnosed by histology were studied cytologically and cytogenetically. Preinvasive lesions showed a good correlation between cytologic impression and the histologic diagnosis. However, among 17 patients with invasive cancer, there were 2 completely negative cytologic impressions. These were in cases having modal chromosome counts of 47 and 48, respectively. This study demonstrates that some invasive cancers of the cervix are resistant to cytologic diagnosis because of their peridiploid chromosome counts and lack of anisokaryosis.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2344313pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2344313pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2344313pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2344313pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2344313pubmed:monthMarlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2344313pubmed:issn0389-2328lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2344313pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MasukawaTTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2344313pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WoodruffJ DJDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2344313pubmed:authorpubmed-author:JonesH WHWJrlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2344313pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KatayamaK PKPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2344313pubmed:authorpubmed-author:StaflAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2344313pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2344313pubmed:volume16lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2344313pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2344313pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2344313pubmed:pagination85-7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2344313pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2344313pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2344313-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2344313pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2344313-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2344313pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2344313-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2344313pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2344313-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2344313pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2344313-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2344313pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2344313-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2344313pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2344313-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2344313pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2344313-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2344313pubmed:year1990lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2344313pubmed:articleTitleAnalysis of false negative cytology by a chromosome study.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2344313pubmed:affiliationAdvanced Institute of Fertility, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53233.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2344313pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2344313pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed