Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:2312516rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2312516lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0016452lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2312516lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0041714lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2312516lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0025663lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2312516lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0302908lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2312516lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0038750lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2312516lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0680730lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2312516lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0439810lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2312516lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2312516lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1148554lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2312516pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2312516pubmed:dateCreated1990-4-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2312516pubmed:abstractTextThree liquid chromatographic (LC) methods employing amperometric detection were compared with the collaboratively studied FDA optimized Monier-Williams distillation method for the determination of total sulfite in 5 food types. The foods included lemon juice, white wine, instant mashed potatoes, golden raisins, and onion flakes. Two of the LC methods (one employing headspace sampling and the other direct injection) used ion-exchange chromatography with a basic mobile phase (pH about 10.8) and a glassy carbon electrode; the third (employing direct injection) used ion-exclusion chromatography with an acidic mobile phase (pH about 2) and a platinum electrode. All 4 methods produced similar results for the wine, lemon juice, and raisins. Results were different for instant mashed potatoes and onion flakes. The headspace-LC method and direct ion-exclusion LC method, both of which employed an alkaline sample extraction, yielded significantly higher values for sulfite in instant potatoes than did the other 2 methods. A large interfering peak with both direct LC methods prevented quantitation of sulfite in the onion flakes. All methods can detect sulfite as low as about 1 microgram/g in 4 of 5 food types examined.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2312516pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2312516pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2312516pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2312516pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2312516pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2312516pubmed:issn0004-5756lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2312516pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LawrenceJ FJFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2312516pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MénardCClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2312516pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ChadhaR KRKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2312516pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2312516pubmed:volume73lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2312516pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2312516pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2312516pubmed:pagination77-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2312516pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2312516pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2312516-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2312516pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2312516-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2312516pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2312516-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2312516pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2312516-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2312516pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2312516-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2312516pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2312516-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2312516pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2312516-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2312516pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2312516-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2312516pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2312516-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2312516pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2312516-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2312516pubmed:articleTitleComparison of three liquid chromatographic methods with FDA optimized Monier-Williams method for determination of total sulfite in foods.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2312516pubmed:affiliationFood Research Division, Bureau of Chemical Safety, Food Directorate, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2312516pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2312516pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed