pubmed-article:2294790 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2294790 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0085263 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:2294790 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0009566 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:2294790 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1515089 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:2294790 | pubmed:issue | 1 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2294790 | pubmed:dateCreated | 1990-2-8 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2294790 | pubmed:abstractText | We reviewed 574 endoscopic sphincterotomy procedures. Fifty-six precut papillotomies were performed. Presenting conditions included choledocholithiasis, cholangitis, benign and malignant papillary strictures, and stenosing papillitis. Complications were identified in 16 percent: perforation in 9 percent, pancreatitis in 5 percent, bleeding in 2 percent, and pancreatic abscess in 2 percent. One patient died. Six patients required operation for complications. Perforation of the duodenum or common bile duct seen within 8 hours was managed with drainage and closure of the perforation with minimal complications. Duodenal perforations operated on later than 8 hours required more extensive procedures. All these patients had significant post-operative complications. Three patients were managed nonoperatively. Precut papillotomy carries a significantly higher complication rate than conventional sphincterotomy. Our experience suggests that there is no place for conservative management of duodenal perforation. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2294790 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2294790 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2294790 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2294790 | pubmed:citationSubset | AIM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2294790 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2294790 | pubmed:month | Jan | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2294790 | pubmed:issn | 0002-9610 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2294790 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:FlintL MLMJr | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2294790 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:BoothF VFV | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2294790 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:DoerrR JRJ | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2294790 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:LuchetteF AFA | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2294790 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:KhalafiR SRS | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2294790 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2294790 | pubmed:volume | 159 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2294790 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2294790 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2294790 | pubmed:pagination | 132-5; discussion 135-6 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2294790 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2006-11-15 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2294790 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2294790-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2294790 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2294790-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2294790 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2294790-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2294790 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2294790-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2294790 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2294790-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2294790 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2294790-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2294790 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2294790-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2294790 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2294790-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2294790 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2294790-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2294790 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2294790-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2294790 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2294790-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2294790 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2294790-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2294790 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:2294790-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2294790 | pubmed:year | 1990 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2294790 | pubmed:articleTitle | Surgical management of complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy with precut papillotomy. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2294790 | pubmed:affiliation | Department of Surgery, State University of New York, Buffalo General Hospital 14203-1154. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2294790 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:2294790 | pubmed:publicationType | Comparative Study | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:2294790 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:2294790 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:2294790 | lld:pubmed |