Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:2265334rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2265334lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0015780lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2265334lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0087111lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2265334lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0042025lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2265334lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0596545lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2265334lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0449851lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2265334pubmed:issue6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2265334pubmed:dateCreated1991-2-14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2265334pubmed:abstractTextOver a 9-year period a simple procedure for the correction of stress urinary incontinence was performed in 86 consecutive patients, 31 of whom had failed a previous anti-incontinence procedure. Success was achieved in 81 cases (94%). Of the 5 failures, 2 were successfully treated with a repeat procedure. Operative time ranged from 14 to 49 min (median 27). The average hospital stay was 2 days. Because of its simplicity and reliability, this technique is recommended for the surgical correction of female stress urinary incontinence.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2265334pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2265334pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2265334pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2265334pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2265334pubmed:monthDeclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2265334pubmed:issn0007-1331lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2265334pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PajkaJ TJTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2265334pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ShakerLLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2265334pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2265334pubmed:volume66lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2265334pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2265334pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2265334pubmed:pagination615-7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2265334pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2265334pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2265334-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2265334pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2265334-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2265334pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2265334-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2265334pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2265334-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2265334pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2265334-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2265334pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2265334-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2265334pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2265334-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2265334pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2265334-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2265334pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2265334-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2265334pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2265334-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2265334pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2265334-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2265334pubmed:year1990lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2265334pubmed:articleTitleExperience with a simplified technique for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2265334pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Surgery, St Louis University School of Medicine.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2265334pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2265334pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed