Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:2239163rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2239163lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0034656lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2239163lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0027342lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2239163lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205064lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2239163lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0019557lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2239163lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2239163lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0016642lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2239163lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205171lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2239163pubmed:issue5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2239163pubmed:dateCreated1990-12-21lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2239163pubmed:abstractTextTotally, 410 patients with a cervical hip fracture were randomized between two methods of osteosynthesis: a single nail (Rydell) and two hook-pins (LIH). Seventy-five percent of the patients were women. Sixty-nine percent were alive after 2 years. The patients were followed up with clinical and radiographic examinations for 2 years postoperatively. No difference between the two groups were found regarding quality of reduction, early displacement within 3 months, extraction after healing, nonunion, late segmental collapse, or reoperation with a total hip arthroplasty. Nor did we find any differences between the two groups when selecting those alive after 2 years or when dividing the fractures in displaced and nondisplaced fractures.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2239163pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2239163pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2239163pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2239163pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2239163pubmed:monthOctlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2239163pubmed:issn0001-6470lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2239163pubmed:authorpubmed-author:JohnellOOlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2239163pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BååthLLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2239163pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SernboIIlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2239163pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NilssonJ AJAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2239163pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2239163pubmed:volume61lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2239163pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2239163pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2239163pubmed:pagination411-4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2239163pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2239163pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2239163-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2239163pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2239163-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2239163pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2239163-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2239163pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2239163-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2239163pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2239163-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2239163pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2239163-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2239163pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2239163-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2239163pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2239163-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2239163pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2239163-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2239163pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2239163-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2239163pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2239163-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2239163pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2239163-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2239163pubmed:year1990lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2239163pubmed:articleTitleInternal fixation of 410 cervical hip fractures. A randomized comparison of a single nail versus two hook-pins.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2239163pubmed:affiliationLund University Department of Orthopedics, Malmö General Hospital, Sweden.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2239163pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2239163pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2239163pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2239163pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed