Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:2213182rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2926606lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2213182lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0011923lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2213182lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205147lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2213182lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2607943lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2213182lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2213182lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1980023lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2213182lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0237881lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2213182lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0750502lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2213182lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205421lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2213182lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0303322lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:issue10lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:dateCreated1990-11-21lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:abstractTextTo identify reversible defects, reinjection of a small amount of thallium-201 (201Tl) following 3-hr delayed imaging was performed in 60 patients with coronary artery disease who had perfusion abnormalities on their post-exercise 201Tl images. Thallium-201 uptake was visually scored and judged as normal (Group 1), reversible defect (Group II), new fill-in after reinjection (Group IIIa) and no fill-in even after reinjection (Group IIIb). New fill-in after reinjection was observed in 27 segments of the 85 segments (32%), showing persistent defect on the stress and delayed images. The wall motion in Group IIIa was worse than Group II but better than Group IIIb. Group IIIa showed Q-wave on ECG more often (69%) than Group II (27%) (p less than 0.01), but less often than Group IIIb (85%) (p less than 0.05). These data indicate that the reinjection 201Tl imaging often identifies new fill-in in the areas of no redistribution on the delayed images and it may hold promise for assessing tissue viability which the conventional imaging may underestimate.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:monthOctlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:issn0161-5505lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TamakiNNlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KawaiCClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:authorpubmed-author:YonekuraYYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KonishiJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HirataKKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KambaraHHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BanTTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:authorpubmed-author:OhtaniHHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NoharaRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:volume31lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:pagination1617-23lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2213182-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2213182-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2213182-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2213182-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2213182-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2213182-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2213182-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2213182-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2213182-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2213182-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2213182-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:year1990lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:articleTitleSignificance of fill-in after thallium-201 reinjection following delayed imaging: comparison with regional wall motion and angiographic findings.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Faculty of Medicine, Japan.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2213182pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:2213182lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:2213182lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:2213182lld:pubmed