Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:2207623rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2207623lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1280500lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2207623lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0683312lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2207623lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1705241lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2207623lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2004457lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2207623lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1705242lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2207623pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2207623pubmed:dateCreated1990-11-2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2207623pubmed:abstractTextIn category classification tasks, typicality effects are usually found: accuracy and reaction time depend upon distance from a prototype. In this study, subjects learned either verbal or nonverbal dot pattern categories, followed by a lateralized classification task. Comparable typicality effects were found in both reaction time and accuracy across visual fields for both verbal and nonverbal categories. Both hemispheres appeared to use a similarity-to-prototype matching strategy in classification. This indicates that merely having a verbal label does not differentiate classification in the two hemispheres.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2207623pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2207623pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2207623pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2207623pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2207623pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2207623pubmed:monthJullld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2207623pubmed:issn0093-934Xlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2207623pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RichardsL GLGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2207623pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ChiarellaMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2207623pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2207623pubmed:volume39lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2207623pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2207623pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2207623pubmed:pagination90-106lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2207623pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2207623pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2207623-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2207623pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2207623-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2207623pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2207623-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2207623pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2207623-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2207623pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2207623-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2207623pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2207623-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2207623pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2207623-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2207623pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2207623-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2207623pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2207623-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2207623pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2207623-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2207623pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2207623-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2207623pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2207623-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2207623pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2207623-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2207623pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2207623-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2207623pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2207623-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2207623pubmed:year1990lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2207623pubmed:articleTitleTypicality effects in artificial categories: is there a hemisphere difference?lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2207623pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Psychology, Syracuse University, NY 13244-2340.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2207623pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2207623pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.lld:pubmed