Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:2204853rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2204853lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0015392lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2204853lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0010042lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2204853lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0035868lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2204853lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0006629lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2204853lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0038969lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2204853lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0449774lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2204853pubmed:issue7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2204853pubmed:dateCreated1990-10-18lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2204853pubmed:abstractTextTorque and antitorque running sutures as described by Eisner are commonly used in penetrating keratoplasty. We tested the rotational effect of three different 16-bite running suture patterns on eight cadaver eyes, with the following results: (1) the torque pattern rotates the corneal graft counterclockwise by 0.7 +/- 0.1 mm at the wound or 11 degrees; (2) the antitorque pattern rotates the corneal graft clockwise by 0.7 +/- 0.1 mm at the wound or 11 degrees; (3) an intermediate "no torque" pattern, the bites of which form an isosceles triangle, produces no rotational effect. We recommend the use of a "no torque" pattern to minimize corneal graft rotation.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2204853pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2204853pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2204853pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2204853pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2204853pubmed:monthJullld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2204853pubmed:issn0022-023Xlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2204853pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HartJ CJClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2204853pubmed:authorpubmed-author:YanVVlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2204853pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MahjoubS BSBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2204853pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2204853pubmed:volume21lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2204853pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2204853pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2204853pubmed:pagination472-4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2204853pubmed:dateRevised2004-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2204853pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2204853-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2204853pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2204853-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2204853pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2204853-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2204853pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2204853-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2204853pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2204853-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2204853pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2204853-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2204853pubmed:year1990lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2204853pubmed:articleTitleSuture patterns and corneal graft rotation in the cadaver eye.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2204853pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Ophthalmology, Louisiana State University Medical Center, Shreveport 71130.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2204853pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed