Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:2189679rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2189679lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0023317lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2189679lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0030054lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2189679lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0597198lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2189679lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1521761lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2189679lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0871208lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2189679pubmed:dateCreated1990-7-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2189679pubmed:abstractTextTo prevent corneal edema in most patients, contact lenses must transmit oxygen to the following minimum degree: (a) in daily wear, 24.1 x 10(-9) (cm x ml O2)/(s x ml x mm Hg), and (b) in extended wear, 34.3 x 10(-9) (cm x ml O2)/(s x ml x mm Hg). High Dk/L ratings are particularly important for patients wearing extended wear lenses and for those with exceptionally high corneal oxygen demand. Nevertheless, it is well known that other lens performance properties can be compromised by manipulating material or design parameters to increase the Dk/L rating. Increasing the Dk/L of hydrogel lenses, for example, may lead to problems such as fragility, dehydration, and corneal adherence. Similarly, high-Dk/L, rigid gas-permeable lenses may exhibit poor surface wettability and flexural resistance, base curve radius changes, and possible corneal adherence. Because such problems can compromise visual acuity, affect ease of handling, or decrease comfort, nonoxygen factors may exert a stronger influence on successful lens wear than high oxygen transmissibility alone for most patients. Among the nonoxygen factors important for contact lens wear are good movement, surface wettability, resistance to deposit buildup, and flexural resistance. Clinicians must consider these properties, along with oxygen transmission ratings, when fitting patients with contact lenses. Lenses that exhibit good overall performance, in my view, provide the greatest probability of successful wear.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2189679pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2189679pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2189679pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2189679pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2189679pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2189679pubmed:issn0277-3740lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2189679pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BennettE SESlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2189679pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2189679pubmed:volume9 Suppl 1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2189679pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2189679pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2189679pubmed:paginationS4-7; discussion S8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2189679pubmed:dateRevised2005-11-16lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2189679pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2189679-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2189679pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2189679-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2189679pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2189679-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2189679pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2189679-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2189679pubmed:year1990lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2189679pubmed:articleTitleHow important are lens oxygen ratings? They are one of many performance factors.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2189679pubmed:affiliationContact Lens Clinic, School of Optometry, University of Missouri-St. Louis 63121.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2189679pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2189679pubmed:publicationTypeReviewlld:pubmed