Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:2179182rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2179182lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0521009lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2179182lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0007450lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2179182lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0042149lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2179182lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0042232lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2179182pubmed:issue6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2179182pubmed:dateCreated1990-4-25lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2179182pubmed:abstractTextBacterial culturing was conducted on samples from the reproductive tracts of 53 clinically healthy female cats. Aerobic bacteria were isolated from 52 of 53 vaginal swab samples and from 2 of 29 uterine swab samples. Anaerobic bacteria were detected in 4 of 30 vaginal and 1 of 29 uterine cultures. The aerobic bacteria included species of Acinetobacter, Actinomyces, Corynebacterium, Escherichia, Haemophilus, Klebsiella, Lactobacillus, Staphylococcus, and Streptococcus. Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, Streptococcus canis, and E coli were the most common organisms and were isolated from 56%, 52%, and 44% of the vaginal samples, respectively. Anaerobes isolated from vaginal samples included 3 species of Bacteroides and 2 isolates of Peptococcus. The single uterine anaerobe isolate was a Lactobacillus sp. The number of bacterial species isolated from each vaginal culture ranged from 1 to 8 (mean, 3). The number of colony forming units tended to vary inversely with the number of bacterial species detected in each sample.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2179182pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2179182pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2179182pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2179182pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2179182pubmed:monthMarlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2179182pubmed:issn0003-1488lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2179182pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WardA CAClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2179182pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ClemetsonL...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2179182pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2179182pubmed:day15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2179182pubmed:volume196lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2179182pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2179182pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2179182pubmed:pagination902-6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2179182pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2179182pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2179182-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2179182pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2179182-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2179182pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2179182-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2179182pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2179182-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2179182pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2179182-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2179182pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2179182-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2179182pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2179182-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2179182pubmed:year1990lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2179182pubmed:articleTitleBacterial flora of the vagina and uterus of healthy cats.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2179182pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University, Pullman 99164.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2179182pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2179182pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2179182pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:2179182lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:2179182lld:pubmed