Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:21693636rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1176472lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:21693636lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0233794lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:21693636lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0040223lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:21693636lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0011546lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:21693636lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0599621lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:21693636lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0680242lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:21693636lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0599668lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:issue7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:dateCreated2011-6-22lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:abstractTextThe roles of muscarinic and nicotinic cholinergic receptors in perirhinal cortex in object recognition memory were compared. Rats' discrimination of a novel object preference test (NOP) test was measured after either systemic or local infusion into the perirhinal cortex of the nicotinic receptor antagonist methyllycaconitine (MLA), which targets alpha-7 (?7) amongst other nicotinic receptors or the muscarinic receptor antagonists scopolamine, AFDX-384, and pirenzepine. Methyllycaconitine administered systemically or intraperirhinally before acquisition impaired recognition memory tested after a 24-h, but not a 20-min delay. In contrast, all three muscarinic antagonists produced a similar, unusual pattern of impairment with amnesia after a 20-min delay, but remembrance after a 24-h delay. Thus, the amnesic effects of nicotinic and muscarinic antagonism were doubly dissociated across the 20-min and 24-h delays. The same pattern of shorter-term but not longer-term memory impairment was found for scopolamine whether the object preference test was carried out in a square arena or a Y-maze and whether rats of the Dark Agouti or Lister-hooded strains were used. Coinfusion of MLA and either scopolamine or AFDX-384 produced an impairment profile matching that for MLA. Hence, the antagonists did not act additively when coadministered. These findings establish an important role in recognition memory for both nicotinic and muscarinic cholinergic receptors in perirhinal cortex, and provide a challenge to simple ideas about the role of cholinergic processes in recognition memory: The effects of muscarinic and nicotinic antagonism are neither independent nor additive.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:issn1549-5485lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AggletonJohn...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TinsleyChris...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BrownMalcolm...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WarburtonE...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:authorpubmed-author:VincentMariaMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Fontaine-Palm...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:authorpubmed-author:EndeanEmma...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:issnTypeElectroniclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:volume18lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:pagination484-92lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21693636...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21693636...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21693636...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21693636...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21693636...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21693636...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21693636...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21693636...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21693636...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21693636...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21693636...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:year2011lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:articleTitleDiffering time dependencies of object recognition memory impairments produced by nicotinic and muscarinic cholinergic antagonism in perirhinal cortex.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:affiliationMRC Centre for Synaptic Plasticity, School of Physiological Sciences, Bristol University, United Kingdom. chris.tinsley@ntu.ac.uklld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21693636pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed