Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:21640777rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0016514lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:21640777lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0003048lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:21640777lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0022885lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:21640777lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0392366lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:21640777lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0392756lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:21640777lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2349090lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:issue33lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:dateCreated2011-7-18lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:abstractTextThe World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) Terrestrial Manual and the European Pharmacopoeia (EP) still prescribe live challenge experiments for foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) immunogenicity and vaccine potency tests. However, the EP allows for other validated tests for the latter, and specifically in vitro tests if a "satisfactory pass level" has been determined; serological replacements are also currently in use in South America. Much research has therefore focused on validating both ex vivo and in vitro tests to replace live challenge. However, insufficient attention has been given to the sensitivity and specificity of the "gold standard"in vivo test being replaced, despite this information being critical to determining what should be required of its replacement. This paper aims to redress this imbalance by examining the current live challenge tests and their associated statistics and determining the confidence that we can have in them, thereby setting a standard for candidate replacements. It determines that the statistics associated with the current EP PD(50) test are inappropriate given our domain knowledge, but that the OIE test statistics are satisfactory. However, it has also identified a new set of live animal challenge test regimes that provide similar sensitivity and specificity to all of the currently used OIE tests using fewer animals (16 including controls), and can also provide further savings in live animal experiments in exchange for small reductions in sensitivity and specificity.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:monthJullld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:issn1873-2518lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SavetJ FJFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HaydonDaniel...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HaasBerndBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SmitsaartElia...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MaradeiEduard...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BarnettPaulPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ReeveRichardRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BeascoecheaCl...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:copyrightInfoCopyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:issnTypeElectroniclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:day26lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:volume29lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:pagination5467-73lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21640777...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21640777...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21640777...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21640777...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21640777...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21640777...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21640777...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21640777...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21640777...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21640777...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:year2011lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:articleTitleReducing animal experimentation in foot-and-mouth disease vaccine potency tests.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:affiliationBoyd Orr Centre for Population and Ecosystem Health, Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, United Kingdom. richard.reeve@glasgow.ac.uklld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21640777pubmed:publicationTypeEvaluation Studieslld:pubmed