Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:2127475rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2127475lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0013072lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2127475lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0011900lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2127475lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0036319lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2127475lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2127475lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0017596lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2127475lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0449851lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2127475pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2127475pubmed:dateCreated1991-4-16lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2127475pubmed:abstractTextIn a double blind study, the Teesdale glass sandwich and Kato-Katz techniques were compared for the diagnosis of Schistosoma mansoni. From each of five stool specimens, six slide preparations were made by each method, and each slide was read independently by two readers. Examination of the differences in the number of eggs per slide by Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) showed no significant differences between methods, readers, or slides prepared from the same specimen at the 90% level of significance.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2127475pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2127475pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2127475pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2127475pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2127475pubmed:monthDeclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2127475pubmed:issn0177-2392lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2127475pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TeesdaleC HCHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2127475pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DixonHHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2127475pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ChitsuloLLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2127475pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2127475pubmed:volume41lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2127475pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2127475pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2127475pubmed:pagination447-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2127475pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2127475pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2127475-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2127475pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2127475-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2127475pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2127475-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2127475pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2127475-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2127475pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2127475-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2127475pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2127475-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2127475pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2127475-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2127475pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2127475-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2127475pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2127475-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2127475pubmed:year1990lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2127475pubmed:articleTitleComparison of the Teesdale glass sandwich and Kato-Katz techniques for the diagnosis of Schistosoma mansoni: a double-blind study.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2127475pubmed:affiliationBilharzia Control Programme, Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2127475pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2127475pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2127475pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed