| pubmed-article:21222355 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21222355 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0021562 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:21222355 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C2936612 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:21222355 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1955832 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:21222355 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C2709063 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:21222355 | pubmed:issue | 12 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21222355 | pubmed:dateCreated | 2011-1-12 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21222355 | pubmed:abstractText | Two popular quality improvement (QI) approaches in health care are Lean and Six Sigma. Hospitals continue to adopt these QI approaches-or the hybrid Lean Sigma approach-with little knowledge on how well they produce sustainable improvements. A systematic literature review was conducted to determine whether Lean, Six Sigma, or Lean Sigma have been effectively used to create and sustain improvements in the acute care setting. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21222355 | pubmed:grant | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21222355 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21222355 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21222355 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21222355 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21222355 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21222355 | pubmed:month | Dec | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21222355 | pubmed:issn | 1553-7250 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21222355 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:KaboliPeter... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21222355 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:GlasgowJustin... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21222355 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:Scott-Caziewe... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21222355 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21222355 | pubmed:volume | 36 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21222355 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21222355 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21222355 | pubmed:pagination | 533-40 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21222355 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21222355... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21222355 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21222355... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21222355 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21222355... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21222355 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21222355... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21222355 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21222355... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21222355 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21222355... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21222355 | pubmed:year | 2010 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21222355 | pubmed:articleTitle | Guiding inpatient quality improvement: a systematic review of Lean and Six Sigma. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21222355 | pubmed:affiliation | Center for Research in the Implementation of Innovative Strategies in Practice, Iowa City Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, USA. justin.glasgow@va.gov | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21222355 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21222355 | pubmed:publicationType | Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21222355 | pubmed:publicationType | Review | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:21222355 | pubmed:publicationType | Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:21222355 | lld:pubmed |
