Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:21123160rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0087111lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:21123160lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0014833lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:21123160lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0006968lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:21123160lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0016610lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:21123160lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0268821lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:21123160lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0231242lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:issue5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:dateCreated2010-12-2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:abstractTextThe aim of this observational prospective study was to compare the effect of fosfomycin tromethanol (FT) and carbapenems (meropenem or imipenem cilastatin) in the treatment of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli-related complicated lower urinary tract infection (CLUTI). Inclusion criteria were: patients who were aged >18 yr with dysuria or problems with frequency or urgency in passing urine; those with >20 leukocytes/mm³ in urine microscopy and culture-proven ESBL-producing carbapenem or FT-sensitive E. coli in the urine (>10? cfu/mm³); no leukocytosis or fever; and who were treated with ft (oral 3 g sachet x 1 every other night, three times) or carbapenems between march 2005 and January 2006 in our outpatient clinic and hospital. A total of 47 CLUTI attacks in 47 patients (27 FT group, 20 carbapenem group) were observed prospectively. Clinical and microbiological success in the carbapenem and ft groups was similar (19/20 vs 21/27 and 16/20 vs 16/27 p>0.05). Drug acquisition costs were significantly lower in the FT group (p<0.001). Although it is not a randomized controlled study, these data show that ft may be a suitable, effective and cheap alternative in the treatment of ESBL-producing E. coli-related CLUTI.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:monthOctlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:issn1973-9478lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:authorpubmed-author:UlusoySSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SenolSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BellJJ3rdlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TasbakanMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:authorpubmed-author:YamazhanTTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PullukcuHHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SipahiO RORlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SipahiHHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:issnTypeElectroniclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:volume22lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:pagination355-7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21123160...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21123160...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21123160...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21123160...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21123160...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21123160...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21123160...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21123160...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21123160...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21123160...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21123160...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21123160...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21123160...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21123160...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21123160...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21123160...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21123160...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21123160...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:year2010lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:articleTitleCarbapenem versus fosfomycin tromethanol in the treatment of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli-related complicated lower urinary tract infection.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:affiliationCelal Bayar University, Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Manisa, Turkey.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21123160pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed