pubmed-article:21079620 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:21079620 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0028754 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:21079620 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1442959 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:21079620 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0199176 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:21079620 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1707455 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:21079620 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0010181 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:21079620 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0039371 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:21079620 | pubmed:issue | 7 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:21079620 | pubmed:dateCreated | 2011-7-12 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:21079620 | pubmed:abstractText | Cost-effectiveness analyses are important tools in efforts to prioritise interventions for obesity prevention. Modelling facilitates evaluation of multiple scenarios with varying assumptions. This study compares the cost-effectiveness of conservative scenarios for two commonly proposed policy-based interventions: front-of-pack 'traffic-light' nutrition labelling (traffic-light labelling) and a tax on unhealthy foods ('junk-food' tax). | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:21079620 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:21079620 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:21079620 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:21079620 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:21079620 | pubmed:month | Jul | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:21079620 | pubmed:issn | 1476-5497 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:21079620 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:SwinburnBB | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:21079620 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:SacksGG | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:21079620 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:VeermanJ LJL | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:21079620 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:MoodieMM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:21079620 | pubmed:issnType | Electronic | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:21079620 | pubmed:volume | 35 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:21079620 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:21079620 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:21079620 | pubmed:pagination | 1001-9 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:21079620 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21079620... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:21079620 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21079620... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:21079620 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21079620... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:21079620 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21079620... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:21079620 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21079620... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:21079620 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21079620... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:21079620 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21079620... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:21079620 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21079620... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:21079620 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21079620... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:21079620 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21079620... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:21079620 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21079620... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:21079620 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:21079620... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:21079620 | pubmed:year | 2011 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:21079620 | pubmed:articleTitle | 'Traffic-light' nutrition labelling and 'junk-food' tax: a modelled comparison of cost-effectiveness for obesity prevention. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:21079620 | pubmed:affiliation | WHO Collaborating Centre for Obesity Prevention, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. gary.sacks@deakin.edu.au | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:21079620 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:21079620 | pubmed:publicationType | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | lld:pubmed |