Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:21053384rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0008976lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:21053384lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0009462lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:21053384lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0037778lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:21053384lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0015732lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:21053384lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0271510lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:21053384lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0206034lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:issue6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:dateCreated2010-11-5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:abstractTextRecruitment of participants to clinical trials remains a significant challenge, especially for research addressing topics of a sensitive nature such as fecal incontinence (FI). In the Fiber Study, a randomized controlled trial on symptom management for FI, we successfully enrolled 189 community-living adults through collaborations with specialty-based and community-based settings, each employing methods tailored to the organizational characteristics of their site. Results show that using the two settings increased racial and ethnic diversity of the sample and inclusion of informal caregivers. There were no differential effects on enrollment, final eligibility, or completion of protocol by site. Strategic collaborations with complementary sites can achieve sample recruitment goals for clinical trials on topics that are sensitive or known to be underreported.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:monthDeclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:issn1098-240Xlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SavikKayKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BlissDonna...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LowryAnnAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:authorpubmed-author:JungHans-Joac...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WhitebirdRobi...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:copyrightInfoCopyright © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:issnTypeElectroniclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:volume33lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:pagination500-11lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21053384...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21053384...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21053384...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21053384...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21053384...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21053384...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21053384...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21053384...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21053384...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21053384...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21053384...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21053384...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21053384...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21053384...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21053384...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21053384...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21053384...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21053384...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21053384...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21053384...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21053384...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21053384...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21053384...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21053384...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:21053384...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:year2010lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:articleTitleComparing community and specialty provider-based recruitment in a randomized clinical trial: clinical trial in fecal incontinence.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:affiliationHealthPartners Research Foundation, Bloomington, MN 55425, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:publicationTypeEvaluation Studieslld:pubmed
pubmed-article:21053384pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, N.I.H., Extramurallld:pubmed