Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:20939836rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20939836lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0015780lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20939836lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1704675lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20939836lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0558295lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20939836pubmed:issue12lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20939836pubmed:dateCreated2010-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20939836pubmed:abstractTextSexual selection is responsible for many of the most spectacular displays in nature, and female preference for certain males is central to much of this. However, female preference is relatively poorly understood, particularly the relative importance of a female's genes, the environment and their interaction on her preference. We investigated preference in a no-choice design using Drosophila melanogaster iso-female lines and find that there are genotype-by-environment interactions for female preference. Whereas the choosiness of some female genotypes differed little across environments, that of others differed greatly, so that the choosiness rank of females in one environment did not necessarily predict their rank in another. Furthermore, the genetic variance underlying preference also varied across environments. These findings have important consequences for the evolution of female preference and the male sexual traits preference targets.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20939836pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20939836pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20939836pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20939836pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20939836pubmed:monthDeclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20939836pubmed:issn1420-9101lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20939836pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HuntJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20939836pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HoskenD JDJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20939836pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WedellNNlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20939836pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MinamizatoTok...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20939836pubmed:copyrightInfo© 2010 The Authors. Journal Compilation © 2010 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20939836pubmed:issnTypeElectroniclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20939836pubmed:volume23lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20939836pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20939836pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20939836pubmed:pagination2550-7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20939836pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20939836...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20939836pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20939836...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20939836pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20939836...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20939836pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20939836...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20939836pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20939836...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20939836pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20939836...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20939836pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20939836...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20939836pubmed:year2010lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20939836pubmed:articleTitleGenotype-by-environment interactions for female preference.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20939836pubmed:affiliationCentre for Conservation and Ecology, School of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Penryn, Cornwall, UK.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20939836pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20939836pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed