pubmed-article:20920141 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0027551 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:20920141 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1883418 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:20920141 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0700198 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:20920141 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1707455 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:issue | 1 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:dateCreated | 2011-4-20 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:abstractText | Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has typically been performed using the 22 gauge (G) dedicated TBNA needle. Recently a new 21G TBNA needle has been introduced. The efficacy of using a larger gauge biopsy needle during EBUS-TBNA has not been reported. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic yield and utility of 21G and 22G needles during EBUS-TBNA. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:month | Jan | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:issn | 1440-1843 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:IizasaToshihi... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:YasufukuKazuh... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:KimuraHidekiH | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:ShingyojiMasa... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:NakajimaTakah... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:TakahashiRyoR | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:ItakuraMeijiM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:ItamiMakikoM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:HirataTetsush... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:MatsuiYukikoY | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:copyrightInfo | © 2010 The Authors. Respirology © 2010 Asian Pacific Society of Respirology. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:issnType | Electronic | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:volume | 16 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:pagination | 90-4 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:20920141... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:20920141... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:20920141... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:20920141... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:20920141... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:20920141... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:20920141... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:20920141... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:20920141... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:20920141... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:20920141... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:20920141... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:20920141... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:20920141... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:20920141... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:year | 2011 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:articleTitle | Comparison of 21-gauge and 22-gauge aspiration needle during endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:affiliation | Division of Thoracic Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:publicationType | Comparative Study | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20920141 | pubmed:publicationType | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | lld:pubmed |