Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:20836876rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20836876lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0016948lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20836876lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0017262lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20836876lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1706244lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20836876lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0033268lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20836876lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2911684lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20836876lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0185117lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20836876pubmed:dateCreated2010-10-5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20836876pubmed:abstractTextThe microbes Escherichia coli and Pichia pastoris are convenient prokaryotic and eukaryotic hosts, respectively, for the recombinant production of proteins at laboratory scales. A comparative study was performed to evaluate a range of constructs and process parameters for the heterologous intra- and extracellular expression of genes encoding the industrially relevant enzyme galactose 6-oxidase (EC 1.1.3.9) from the fungus Fusarium graminearum. In particular, the wild-type galox gene from F. graminearum, an optimized variant for E. coli and a codon-optimized gene for P. pastoris were expressed without the native pro-sequence, but with a His-tag either at the N- or the C-terminus of the enzyme.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20836876pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20836876pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20836876pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20836876pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20836876pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20836876pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20836876pubmed:issn1475-2859lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20836876pubmed:authorpubmed-author:OlssonLisbeth...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20836876pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BrumerHarryH3...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20836876pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SpadiutOliver...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20836876pubmed:issnTypeElectroniclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20836876pubmed:volume9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20836876pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20836876pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20836876pubmed:pagination68lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20836876pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20836876...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20836876pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20836876...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20836876pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20836876...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20836876pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20836876...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20836876pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20836876...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20836876pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20836876...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20836876pubmed:year2010lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20836876pubmed:articleTitleA comparative summary of expression systems for the recombinant production of galactose oxidase.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20836876pubmed:affiliationDivision of Glycoscience, School of Biotechnology, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20836876pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20836876pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20836876pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed