Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:20733022rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20733022lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0042903lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20733022lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0015219lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20733022lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0032893lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20733022lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0521116lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20733022pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20733022pubmed:dateCreated2011-2-18lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20733022pubmed:abstractTextThis review presents the evolution of sutureless vitrectomy and describes the minimisation of surgical techniques in the posterior segment, as well as their advantages and disadvantages. Shorter operating time, improvement of patient comfort and faster visual recovery are feasible when using small-diameter sutureless vitrectomy technique and equipment. However, a number of associated problems, such as postsurgical hypotony and endophthalmitis, were noticed initially in higher rates compared to 20-gauge vitreoretinal surgery. The purpose of this review is to summarise the available information on transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy and evaluate its role in modern vitreous surgery.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20733022pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20733022pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20733022pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20733022pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20733022pubmed:monthMarlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20733022pubmed:issn1468-2079lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20733022pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MoisseievJose...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20733022pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FabianIdo...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20733022pubmed:issnTypeElectroniclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20733022pubmed:volume95lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20733022pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20733022pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20733022pubmed:pagination318-24lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20733022pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20733022...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20733022pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20733022...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20733022pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20733022...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20733022pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20733022...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20733022pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20733022...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20733022pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20733022...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20733022pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20733022...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20733022pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20733022...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20733022pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20733022...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20733022pubmed:year2011lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20733022pubmed:articleTitleSutureless vitrectomy: evolution and current practices.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20733022pubmed:affiliationThe Goldschleger Eye Institute, The Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer 52621, Tel Aviv, Israel. didifabian@gmail.comlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20733022pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20733022pubmed:publicationTypeReviewlld:pubmed