Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:2071024rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0026336lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2071024lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0314603lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2071024lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0015219lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2071024lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0439659lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2071024lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0679426lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2071024lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1516451lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2071024lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1514623lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:dateCreated1991-8-22lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:abstractTextRecent genetic analyses have demonstrated that self-incompatibility in flowering plants derives from the coordinated expression of a system of loci. To address the selective mechanisms through which a genetic system of this kind evolves, I present a three-locus model for the origin of gametophytic self-incompatibility. Conventional models assume that a single locus encodes all physiological effects associated with self-incompatibility and that the viability of offspring depends only on whether they were derived by selfing or outcrossing. My model explicitly represents the genetic determination of offspring viability by a locus subject to symmetrically overdominant selection. Initially, the level of expression of the proto-S locus is insufficient to induce self-incompatibility. Weak gametophytic self-incompatibility arises upon the introduction of a rare allele at an unlinked modifier locus which enhances the expression of the proto-S locus. While conventional models predict that the origin of self-incompatibility requires at least two- to threefold levels of inbreeding depression, I find that the comparatively low levels of inbreeding depression generated by a single overdominant locus can ensure the invasion of an enhancer of self-incompatibility under sufficiently high rates of receipt of self-pollen. Associations among components of the incompatibility system promote the origin of self-incompatibility. Enhancement of heterozygosity at the initially neutral proto-S locus improves offspring viability through associative overdominance. Further, the modifier that enhances the expression of self-incompatibility develops a direct association with heterozygosity at the overdominant viability locus. These results suggest that the evolutionary processes by which incompatibility systems originate may differ significantly from those associated with their breakdown. The genetic mechanism explored here may apply to the evolution of other systems that restrict reproduction, including maternal-fetal incompatibility in mammals.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:monthJunlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:issn0016-6731lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:authorpubmed-author:UyenoyamaM...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:volume128lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:pagination453-69lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:dateRevised2010-11-18lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2071024-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2071024-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2071024-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2071024-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2071024-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2071024-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2071024-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2071024-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2071024-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2071024-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2071024-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2071024-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:year1991lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:articleTitleOn the evolution of genetic incompatibility systems. VI. A three-locus modifier model for the origin of gametophytic self-incompatibility.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Zoology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27706.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2071024pubmed:publicationTypeReviewlld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:2071024lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:2071024lld:pubmed