Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:20680995rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0004448lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20680995lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0476254lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20680995lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1704675lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20680995lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205307lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20680995lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1261322lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20680995lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0034754lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20680995lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0376335lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20680995lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1709694lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:dateCreated2010-8-3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:abstractTextWe investigated whether phonological deficits are a consequence of magnocellular processing deficits in dyslexic and control children. In Experiment 1, children were tested for reading ability, phonological awareness, visuo-magnocellular motion perception, and attention shifting (sometimes considered as magnocellular function). A two-step cluster analysis of the behavioural scores revealed four clusters of children. Phonological awareness was correlated with attention (cluster musical sharp1) or motion detection (cluster musical sharp2), whereas attention and motion detection were correlated in cluster musical sharp3. In cluster musical sharp4, all variables were uncorrelated. In Experiment 2, the same variables plus auditory discrimination were tested with fMRI in a sub-sample of Experiment 1. Although dyslexics had reduced activation in visual or auditory cortex during motion detection or auditory discrimination, respectively, they had increased right frontal activation in areas 44 and 45 in all 'magnocellular' (including auditory) tasks. In contrasts, during phonological decisions, there was higher activation for good readers than dyslexics in left areas 44 and 45. Together, the two experiments give insight into the interplay of phonological and magnocellular processing during reading. Distinct left versus right frontal effects reveal partly different underlying neural mechanisms. These data contradict the view that phonological processing deficits in dyslexia necessarily result from impaired magnocellular functioning.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:monthAuglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:issn1099-0909lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GrabowskaAnna...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AmuntsKatrinKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HuberWalterWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GrandeMarionMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HeimStefanSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:authorpubmed-author:van...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MeffertElisab...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Pape-NeumannJ...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:copyrightInfo2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:issnTypeElectroniclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:volume16lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:pagination258-82lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20680995...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20680995...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20680995...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20680995...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20680995...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20680995...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20680995...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20680995...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20680995...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20680995...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20680995...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20680995...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20680995...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20680995...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20680995...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:year2010lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:articleTitleInteraction of phonological awareness and 'magnocellular' processing during normal and dyslexic reading: behavioural and fMRI investigations.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:affiliationJARA-BRAIN, Jülich and Aachen, Germany. sheim@ukaachen.delld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20680995pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed