Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:20643872rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0037369lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20643872lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0677453lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20643872lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0337664lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20643872lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0599755lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20643872lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0004927lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20643872lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0392756lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20643872lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0851285lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20643872lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0681531lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20643872lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0029040lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:issue6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:dateCreated2010-12-1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:abstractTextThis study examined the degree to which legislation intended to reduce the incidence of cigarette-caused fires influenced the behaviours of a cohort of smokers in Ontario. A random digit dialled telephone survey of adult smokers residing in Ontario was conducted in 2005, ending 1 month prior to the reduced ignition propensity (RIP) regulation's implementation date. A follow-up survey was conducted one year later. Of the baseline participants, 73.0% (n=435) completed the follow-up survey. The frequency of fire risk behaviours was similar across both surveys. At baseline, only 3.7% of smokers interviewed reported that their cigarettes went out on their own 'often' while smoking. Following the implementation of the reduced ignition propensity legislation, this increased significantly to 14.7%. Results suggest that the proportion of Ontario smokers who reported engaging in behaviour such as leaving a cigarette burning unattended and smoking in bed actually declined, although these declines were not statistically significant across all measures of fire risk.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:monthDeclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:issn1475-5785lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HylandAndrewAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CummingsK...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HammondDavidDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GiovinoGary...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:authorpubmed-author:O'ConnorRicha...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FongGeoffrey...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FixBrian VBVlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:issnTypeElectroniclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:volume16lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:pagination420-2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20643872...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20643872...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20643872...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20643872...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20643872...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20643872...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20643872...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20643872...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20643872...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20643872...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20643872...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20643872...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20643872...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20643872...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20643872...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20643872...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20643872...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:year2010lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:articleTitleThe impact of reduced ignition propensity cigarette regulation on smoking behaviour in a cohort of Ontario smokers.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York 14263, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20643872pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, N.I.H., Extramurallld:pubmed