Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:20636277rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0019704lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20636277lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0030705lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20636277lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0026882lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20636277lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0033607lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20636277lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20636277lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0449560lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20636277lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0039725lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:issue6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:dateCreated2010-9-27lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:abstractTextProtease inhibitor (PI) resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) are commonly observed in PI-naïve patients who infected with HIV-1 subtype A/E. Few data are available on the genetic mechanisms of PI resistance in non-B HIV-1. This study was aimed to compare PI-RAMs between PI-naïve and -experienced patients and determine PI resistance in each group. Genotypic resistance testing was conducted among a cohort of HIV-1-infected patients who were diagnosed with virologic failure. We studied 137 patients of whom 75 patients were in PI-naïve group and 62 patients in PI-experienced group. Median CD4 cell count and HIV-1 RNA at virologic failure were 169 cells/mm³ and 14,100 copies/mL, respectively. The clinical characteristics between 2 groups were similar (p>0.05) except for the duration of antiretroviral therapy (ART) which was shorter in PI-naïve group (31.5 vs. 46.8 months, p=0.028). Proportion of patients with primary PI-RAMs was 2.7% in PI-naïve and 19% in PI-experienced groups (p=0.002). The most common primary PI-RAMs in the latter group were V82A (10%), I54V (7%) and G48V (4.8%). Proportion of patients with secondary PI-RAMs in the corresponding groups was 99% and 98%, respectively (p=1.000). The most common secondary PI-RAMs in both groups were M36I (91%), H69K (34%) and L89M (30%). In conclusion, primary PI-RAMs are observed exclusively among PI-experienced patients whereas secondary PI-RAMs are equally found in both PI-naïve and PI-experienced patients. Further studies to define virologic response of HIV-1 subtype A/E to various PIs and clinical validation of PI-RAMs in HIV-1 subtype A/E are essentially needed.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:monthSeplld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:issn1873-4251lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ChantratitaWa...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Sungkanuparph...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SukasemChonla...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Wiboonchutiku...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WathipthunCho...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:issnTypeElectroniclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:day1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:volume8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:pagination456-60lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20636277...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20636277...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20636277...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20636277...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20636277...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20636277...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20636277...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20636277...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20636277...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20636277...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20636277...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20636277...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20636277...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20636277...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20636277...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:year2010lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:articleTitleComparison of protease inhibitor (PI) resistance-associated mutations between PI-naïve and PI-experienced HIV-1 infected patients in Thailand where subtype A/E is predominant.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20636277pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed