Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:20565179rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20565179lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1521840lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20565179pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20565179pubmed:dateCreated2010-6-22lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20565179pubmed:abstractTextTask switching involves processing target stimuli in accordance with a frequently changing series of tasks. An outstanding issue is whether this processing is tailored to the perceptual or categorical representation of targets. To address this issue, the authors compared switch costs in responding to targets that were perceptually distinct (words and images) but associated with the same categories (colors and shapes). In four experiments that varied the degree to which words and images were mixed together, no differences in switch costs were observed. These results support the idea that categorical target representations are central to task switching.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20565179pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20565179pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20565179pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20565179pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20565179pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20565179pubmed:monthJunlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20565179pubmed:issn1878-7290lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20565179pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LoganGordon...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20565179pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SchneiderDarr...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20565179pubmed:copyrightInfo(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved).lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20565179pubmed:issnTypeElectroniclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20565179pubmed:volume64lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20565179pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20565179pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20565179pubmed:pagination129-33lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20565179pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20565179...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20565179pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20565179...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20565179pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20565179...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20565179pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20565179...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20565179pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20565179...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20565179pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20565179...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20565179pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20565179...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20565179pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20565179...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20565179pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20565179...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20565179pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20565179...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20565179pubmed:year2010lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20565179pubmed:articleTitleThe target of task switching.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20565179pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. dws@cmu.edulld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20565179pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20565179pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20565179pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, N.I.H., Extramurallld:pubmed