pubmed-article:20552371 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0002690 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:20552371 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0936012 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:20552371 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0181631 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:20552371 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0521116 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:20552371 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1521802 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:issue | 1 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:dateCreated | 2010-12-20 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:abstractText | An inadequate closure of the appendix stump leads to intra-abdominal surgical site infection. The effectiveness of various appendiceal stump closure methods, for instance, staplers or endoloops, was evaluated. Many analyses show that the use of a stapler for transection and closure of the appendiceal stump lowers the risk of this infection but a statistically significant risk of postoperative intra-abdominal abscess or wound infection was not considered in any randomized study. The aim of this study was to evaluate the complications after using endoloops in a high-volume center. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:month | Jan | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:issn | 1432-2218 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:LippertHansH | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:ProssMatthias... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:KubeRainerR | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:SchmidtSybill... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:SahmMaikM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:RitterChristi... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:issnType | Electronic | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:volume | 25 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:pagination | 124-9 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:20552371... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:20552371... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:20552371... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:20552371... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:20552371... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:20552371... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:20552371... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:20552371... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:20552371... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:20552371... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:20552371... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:20552371... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:20552371... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:20552371... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:20552371... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:20552371... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:20552371... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:20552371... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:20552371... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:20552371... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:20552371... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:20552371... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:20552371... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:20552371... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:20552371... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:year | 2011 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:articleTitle | Current analysis of endoloops in appendiceal stump closure. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:affiliation | Department of Surgery, DRK Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Klinik für Chirurgie, Salvador Allende Straße 2-8, 12559, Berlin, Germany. m.sahm@drk-kliniken-berlin.de | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:20552371 | pubmed:publicationType | Evaluation Studies | lld:pubmed |