Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:20550220rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20550220lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0086511lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20550220lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0019552lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20550220lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1861172lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20550220lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0199176lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20550220lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0439810lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20550220lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205464lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20550220lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0010181lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20550220lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1955832lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20550220pubmed:issue7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20550220pubmed:dateCreated2010-6-16lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20550220pubmed:abstractTextTotal hip and knee replacements (THR and TKR) are high-risk settings for venous thromboembolism (VTE). This review summarizes the cost effectiveness of VTE prophylaxis regimens for THR and TKR. We searched MEDLINE (January 1997 to October 2009), EMBASE (January 1997 to June 2009) and the UK NHS Economic Evaluation Database (1997 to October 2009). We analysed recent cost-effectiveness studies examining five categories of comparisons: (i) anticoagulants (warfarin, low-molecular-weight heparin [LMWH] or fondaparinux) versus acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin); (ii) LMWH versus warfarin; (iii) fondaparinux versus LMWH; (iv) comparisons with new oral anticoagulants; and (v) extended-duration (> or =3 weeks) versus short-duration (<3 weeks) prophylaxis. We abstracted information on cost and effectiveness for each prophylaxis regimen in order to calculate an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Because of variations in effectiveness units reported and horizon length analysed, we calculated two cost-effectiveness ratios, one for the number of symptomatic VTE events avoided at 90 days and the other for QALYs at the 1-year mark or beyond. Our search identified 33 studies with 67 comparisons. After standardization, comparisons between LMWH and warfarin were inconclusive, whereas fondaparinux dominated LMWH in nearly every comparison. The latter results were derived from radiographic VTE rates. Extended-duration prophylaxis after THR was generally cost effective. Small numbers prohibit conclusions about aspirin, new oral anticoagulants or extended-duration prophylaxis after TKR. Fondaparinux after both THR and TKR and extended-duration LMWH after THR appear to be cost-effective prophylaxis regimens. Small numbers for other comparisons and absence of trials reporting symptomatic endpoints prohibit comprehensive conclusions.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20550220pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20550220pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20550220pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20550220pubmed:citationSubsetTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20550220pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20550220pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20550220pubmed:issn1179-2027lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20550220pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KatzJeffrey...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20550220pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LosinaElenaElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20550220pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SegalJodi BJBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20550220pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SmithKenneth...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20550220pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BerlowitzDanDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20550220pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KapoorAlokAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20550220pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ChuangWarrenWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20550220pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Radhakrishnan...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20550220pubmed:issnTypeElectroniclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20550220pubmed:volume28lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20550220pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20550220pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20550220pubmed:pagination521-38lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20550220pubmed:dateRevised2011-3-29lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20550220pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20550220...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20550220pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20550220...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20550220pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20550220...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20550220pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20550220...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20550220pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20550220...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20550220pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20550220...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20550220pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20550220...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20550220pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20550220...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20550220pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20550220...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20550220pubmed:year2010lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20550220pubmed:articleTitleCost effectiveness of venous thromboembolism pharmacological prophylaxis in total hip and knee replacement: a systematic review.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20550220pubmed:affiliationHospital Medicine Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02118, USA. alok.kapoor@bmc.orglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20550220pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20550220pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20550220pubmed:publicationTypeReviewlld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:20550220lld:pubmed