Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:20406540rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0442027lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20406540lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1704353lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20406540lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1511790lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20406540lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0304402lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20406540lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0699733lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20406540lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205548lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20406540lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0439831lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:dateCreated2010-4-21lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:abstractTextThe Rapid Stat assay, a point-of-collection drug-testing device for detection of amphetamines, cannabinoids, cocaine, opiates, methadone, and benzodiazepines in oral fluid, was evaluated for cannabis and amphetamine-type stimulants. The Rapid Stat tests (n = 134) were applied by police officers in routine traffic checks. Oral fluid and blood samples were analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) for Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol, amphetamine, methamphetamine, methylenedioxymethamphetamine, methylenedioxyethylamphetamine, and methylenedioxyamphetamine. The comparison of GC-MS analysis of oral fluid with the Rapid Stat results for cannabis showed a sensitivity of 85%, a specificity of 87%, and a total confirmation rate of 87%. When compared with serum, the sensitivity of the cannabis assay decreased to 71%, the specificity to 60%, and the total confirmation rate to 66%. These findings were possibly caused by an incorrect reading of the THC test results. Comparison of the Rapid Stat amphetamine assay with GC-MS in oral fluid showed a sensitivity of 94%, a specificity of 97%, and a total confirmation rate of 97%. Compared with serum, a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 90%, and a total confirmation rate of 92% was found. The amphetamine assay must, therefore, be regarded as satisfactory.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:monthAprlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:issn1945-2403lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BeckerJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:authorpubmed-author:UrbanRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RöhrichJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ZörntleinSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:issnTypeElectroniclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:volume34lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:pagination155-61lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:dateRevised2011-5-10lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20406540...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20406540...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20406540...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20406540...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20406540...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20406540...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20406540...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20406540...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20406540...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20406540...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20406540...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20406540...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20406540...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20406540...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20406540...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20406540...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20406540...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:year2010lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:articleTitleDetection of Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol and amphetamine-type stimulants in oral fluid using the Rapid Stat point-of-collection drug-testing device.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:affiliationInstitute of Legal Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Am Pulverturm 3, Mainz, Germany. roehrich@uni-mainz.delld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20406540pubmed:publicationTypeEvaluation Studieslld:pubmed