Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:20234000rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0001554lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20234000lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0087178lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20234000lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0332875lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20234000lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0033105lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20234000lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0750572lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20234000lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20234000lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0086931lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20234000lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0038951lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:dateCreated2010-3-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:abstractTextThe authors examined whether paper-and-pencil and Web surveys administered in the school setting yield equivalent risk behavior prevalence estimates. Data were from a methods study conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in spring 2008. Intact classes of 9th- or 10th-grade students were assigned randomly to complete a survey via paper-and-pencil or Web. Data from 5,227 students were analyzed using logistic regression to identify associations of mode with reporting of 74 risk behaviors. Mode was associated with reporting of only 7 of the 74 risk behaviors. Results indicate prevalence estimates from paper-and-pencil and Web school-based surveys are generally equivalent.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:citationSubsetTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:monthAprlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:issn1552-3926lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KannLauraLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BrenerNancy...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RossJames GJGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:authorpubmed-author:McManusTimTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DennistonMaxi...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:authorpubmed-author:EatonDanice...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RobertsAlice...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KyleTonja MTMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FlintKatherin...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:issnTypeElectroniclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:volume34lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:pagination137-53lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20234000...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20234000...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20234000...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20234000...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20234000...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20234000...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20234000...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20234000...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20234000...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20234000...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20234000...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20234000...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20234000...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20234000...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20234000...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20234000...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20234000...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20234000...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20234000...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:year2010lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:articleTitleComparison of paper-and-pencil versus Web administration of the Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS): risk behavior prevalence estimates.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:affiliationDivision of Adolescent and School Health, Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy. NE, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA. dhe0@cdc.govlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20234000pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed