Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:2019106rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2019106lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0005741lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2019106pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2019106pubmed:dateCreated1991-5-29lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2019106pubmed:abstractTextThe microbiologic evaluations of 332 consecutive patients with the primary diagnosis of chronic blepharitis were reviewed and compared to those of 160 control patients. The most commonly isolated organisms from lids with blepharitis were Staphylococcus epidermidis (95.8%), Propronibacterium acnes (92.8%), Corynebacterium sp. (76.8%), Acinetobacter sp. (11.4%), and Staphylococcus aureus (10.5%). Compared to controls, S. epidermidis (p less than 0.01), P. acnes (p less than 0.02), and Corynebacterium sp. (p less than 0.001) were present significantly more often. S. aureus and the isolation of more than one microbial species were not more common in blepharitis patients. Quantitatively, heavy growth, by total and individual species, was significantly more common in blepharitis patients (total, p less than 0.001; S. epidermidis, p less than 0.001, P. acnes, p less than 0.001). These data demonstrate that patients with blepharitis are more likely to have normal skin bacteria on their lids and in greater quantities than nonblepharitis patients.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2019106pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2019106pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2019106pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2019106pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2019106pubmed:monthJanlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2019106pubmed:issn0277-3740lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2019106pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MurphyBBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2019106pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GrodenL RLRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2019106pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GenvertG IGIlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2019106pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RodniteJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2019106pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2019106pubmed:volume10lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2019106pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2019106pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2019106pubmed:pagination50-3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2019106pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2019106pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2019106-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2019106pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2019106-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2019106pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2019106-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2019106pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2019106-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2019106pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2019106-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2019106pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2019106-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2019106pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2019106-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2019106pubmed:year1991lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2019106pubmed:articleTitleLid flora in blepharitis.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2019106pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of South Florida, School of Medicine, Tampa.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2019106pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2019106pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:2019106lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:2019106lld:pubmed