Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:2017414rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2017414lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0035168lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2017414lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0041401lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2017414lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0005910lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2017414lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1317574lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2017414lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0018270lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2017414lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0036576lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2017414lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205134lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:2017414pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2017414pubmed:dateCreated1991-5-23lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2017414pubmed:abstractTextThe growth curve of a population of turkeys selected for increased 16 wk BW (Line F) and a randombred control population (RBC2) was determined. It was concluded that the Gompertz equation best described the growth pattern of Lines F and RBC2 regardless of sex. Line F had higher BW at hatching, BW and slope at point of inflection (POI), and asymptotic BW than Line RBC2. Age at POI and asymptote were achieved later for Line RBC2 than for Line F. Male turkeys had higher BW and age at POI and BW and age at asymptote than females. Slope at POI was greater for females than for males.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2017414pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2017414pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2017414pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2017414pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2017414pubmed:monthJanlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2017414pubmed:issn0032-5791lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2017414pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NestorK EKElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2017414pubmed:authorpubmed-author:EmmersonD ADAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2017414pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AnthonyN BNBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2017414pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2017414pubmed:volume70lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2017414pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2017414pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2017414pubmed:pagination192-4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2017414pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2017414pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2017414-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2017414pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2017414-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2017414pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2017414-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2017414pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2017414-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2017414pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2017414-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2017414pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2017414-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2017414pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:2017414-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2017414pubmed:year1991lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2017414pubmed:articleTitleResearch note: Influence of body weight selection on the growth curve of turkeys.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2017414pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Poultry Science, Ohio State University, Wooster 44691.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2017414pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2017414pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:2017414pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed