Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:20008302rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0030705lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20008302lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0026764lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20008302lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0039736lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20008302lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0011777lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20008302lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1144149lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20008302lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0683941lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20008302lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1518321lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:issue7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:dateCreated2010-2-19lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:abstractTextThe objective of this case-control study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (len/dex) versus thalidomide plus dexamethasone (thal/dex) as initial therapy for newly diagnosed myeloma. We retrospectively studied 411 newly diagnosed patients treated with len/dex (228) or thal/dex (183) at the Mayo Clinic. The differences were similar in a matched-pair analysis that adjusted for age, sex, transplantation status, and dexamethasone dose. The proportions of patients achieving at least a partial response to len/dex and thal/dex were 80.3% versus 61.2%, respectively (P < .001); very good partial response rates were 34.2% and 12.0%, respectively (P < .001). Patients receiving len/dex had longer time to progression (median, 27.4 vs 17.2 months; P = .019), progression-free survival (median, 26.7 vs 17.1 months; P = .036), and overall survival (median not reached vs 57.2 months; P = .018). A similar proportion of patients in the 2 groups experienced at least one grade 3 or 4 adverse event (57.5% vs 54.6%, P = .568). Main grade 3 or 4 toxicities of len/dex were hematologic, mainly neutropenia (14.6% vs 0.6%, P < .001); the most common toxicities in thal/dex were venous thromboembolism (15.3% vs 9.2%, P = .058) and peripheral neuropathy (10.4% vs 0.9%, P < .001). Len/dex appears well-tolerated and more effective than thal/dex. Randomized trials are needed to confirm these results.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:monthFeblld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:issn1528-0020lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WitzigThomas...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DispenzieriAn...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GertzMorie...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LacyMartha...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KyleRobert...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GreippPhilip...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RajkumarS...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LustJohn AJAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FonsecaRafael...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KumarShajiSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RussellStephe...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BergsagelP...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:authorpubmed-author:StewartA...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RoyVivekVlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ReederCraig...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ZeldenrustSte...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DingliDavidDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HaymanSuzanne...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BuadiFrancisFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GayFrancescaFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MikhaelJoseph...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:issnTypeElectroniclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:day18lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:volume115lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:pagination1343-50lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:dateRevised2011-7-25lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20008302...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20008302...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20008302...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20008302...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20008302...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20008302...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20008302...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20008302...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20008302...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20008302...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20008302...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20008302...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20008302...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20008302...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20008302...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20008302...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20008302...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20008302...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20008302...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20008302...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20008302...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:year2010lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:articleTitleLenalidomide plus dexamethasone versus thalidomide plus dexamethasone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a comparative analysis of 411 patients.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20008302pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, N.I.H., Extramurallld:pubmed