Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:19770056rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0599851lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19770056lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0233849lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19770056lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0035397lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19770056lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1709694lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19770056lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0443264lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:dateCreated2009-12-7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:abstractTextThe neural processing of reward can be differentiated into two sub-components with different functions, "wanting" (i.e., the expectation of a reward which includes appetitive and motivational components) and "liking" (i.e., the hedonic impact experienced during the receipt of a reward), involving distinct neural systems. We hypothesize that variability in neural reward processing previously observed in healthy subjects could reflect inter-individual differences in personality. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate how the neural processing during expectation and reception of a reward depends on interpersonal differences in reward sensitivity, more specifically the tendency to approach vs. avoid reward-related situations. We employed event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging during a monetary incentive delay task. Subjects with a high approach motivation showed more activation of the Ventral Striatum (VS) during the receipt of a reward, and more medial orbitofrontal activity during both the receipt and omission of a reward. Subjects with a high behavioral inhibition showed less activation in the VS during the receipt of a reward. These findings indicate that the tendency to approach or avoid reward-related situations exhibits a distinct relation with neural reward processing. Specifically, subjects with high behavioral approach appear to be sensitive mainly to positive outcomes and to a lesser extent to the omissions of rewards, whereas subjects with low behavioral approach as well as those with a high inhibition tendency display a blunted response to rewards.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:monthJanlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:issn1095-9572lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FiebachChrist...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WeisbrodMatth...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KaiserStefanSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FriederichHan...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:authorpubmed-author:StippichChris...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WaltherStepha...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SimonJoe JJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:issnTypeElectroniclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:day15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:volume49lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:pagination1868-74lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19770056...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19770056...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19770056...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19770056...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19770056...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19770056...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19770056...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19770056...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19770056...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19770056...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19770056...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19770056...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19770056...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19770056...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19770056...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19770056...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19770056...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:year2010lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:articleTitleNeural reward processing is modulated by approach- and avoidance-related personality traits.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:affiliationSection of Experimental Psychopathology, Department of Psychiatry, University of Heidelberg, Germany. joe.simon@psychologie.uni-heidelberg.delld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19770056pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:19770056lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:19770056lld:pubmed