Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:19680616rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0006142lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19680616lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0030705lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19680616lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0385242lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19680616lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0333516lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19680616lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1336646lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19680616lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0023688lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19680616lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0597360lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19680616lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0237881lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19680616lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0220901lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19680616lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0750502lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:issue10lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:dateCreated2009-10-6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:abstractTextTNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) induces apoptosis upon binding to TRAIL receptors 1 and 2 (TRAIL-R1/DR4 and TRAIL-R2/DR5). TRAIL-R3 (DcR1) and TRAIL-R4 (DcR2) have no or only a truncated cytoplasmic death domain. Consequently, they cannot induce apoptosis and instead have been proposed to inhibit apoptosis induction by TRAIL. Agonists for the apoptosis-inducing TRAIL-R1 and TRAIL-R2 are currently tested in clinical trials. To determine the expression pattern of all surface-bound TRAIL receptors and their prognostic clinical value, we investigated tumour samples of 311 patients with breast cancer by immunohistochemistry. TRAIL receptor expression profiles were correlated with clinico-pathological data, disease-free survival and overall survival. TRAIL-R1 was more strongly expressed in better differentiated tumours, and correlated positively with surrogate markers of a better prognosis (hormone receptor status, Bcl-2, negative nodal status), but negatively with the expression of Her2/neu and the proliferation marker Ki67. In contrast, TRAIL-R2 and TRAIL-R4 expression correlated with higher tumour grades, higher Ki67 index, higher Her2/neu expression and a positive nodal status at the time of diagnosis, but with lower expression of Bcl-2. Thus, the TRAIL receptor expression pattern was predictive of nodal status. Patients with grade 1 and 2 tumours, who had TRAIL-R2 but no TRAIL-R1, showed a positive lymph node status in 47% of the cases. Vice versa, only 19% had a positive nodal status with high TRAIL-R1 but low TRAIL-R2. Most strikingly, TRAIL-R4 and -R2 expression negatively correlated with overall survival of breast cancer patients. Although TRAIL-R2 correlated with more aggressive tumour behaviour, mammary carcinoma could be sensitised to TRAIL-R2-induced apoptosis, suggesting that TRAIL-R2 might therefore be used to therapeutically target such tumours. Hence, determination of the TRAIL receptor expression profile may aid in defining which breast cancer patients have a higher risk of lymph node metastasis and worse overall survival and on the other hand will help to guide TRAIL-based tumour therapy.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:monthOctlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:issn1432-1440lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SinnHans-Pete...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WalczakHennin...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:authorpubmed-author:StremmelWolfg...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MansmannUlric...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KoschnyRonald...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AulmannSebast...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SykoraJaromir...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GantenTom MTMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BatkeEmanuela...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:issnTypeElectroniclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:volume87lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:pagination995-1007lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:dateRevised2011-7-8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19680616...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19680616...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19680616...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19680616...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19680616...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19680616...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19680616...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19680616...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19680616...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19680616...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19680616...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19680616...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19680616...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19680616...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19680616...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19680616...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19680616...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19680616...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19680616...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19680616...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19680616...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:year2009lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:articleTitlePrognostic significance of tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) receptor expression in patients with breast cancer.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:affiliationDivision of Apoptosis Regulation (D040), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19680616pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:19680616lld:pubmed