Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:19523854rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0332307lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19523854lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0025663lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19523854lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1282910lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19523854lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0242485lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19523854lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0234621lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19523854lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0175674lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19523854lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0936012lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19523854lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205210lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19523854lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0220922lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19523854lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0449445lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19523854lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205134lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:issue9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:dateCreated2009-8-7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:abstractTextEnhancement characteristics after administration of a contrast agent are regarded as a major criterion for differential diagnosis in magnetic resonance mammography (MRM). However, no consensus exists about the best measurement method to assess contrast enhancement kinetics. This systematic investigation was performed to compare visual estimation with manual region of interest (ROI) and computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) analysis for time curve measurements in MRM.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:monthSeplld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:issn1878-4046lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KaiserWerner...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CamaraOumarOlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GajdaMieczysl...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:authorpubmed-author:VagTiborTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DietzelMatthi...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BaltzerPascal...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FreibergChris...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BegerSebastia...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HerzogAimee...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:issnTypeElectroniclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:volume16lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:pagination1070-6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19523854...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19523854...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19523854...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19523854...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19523854...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19523854...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19523854...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19523854...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19523854...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19523854...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19523854...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19523854...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19523854...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19523854...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19523854...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19523854...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19523854...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19523854...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19523854...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19523854...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19523854...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:year2009lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:articleTitleClinical MR-mammography: are computer-assisted methods superior to visual or manual measurements for curve type analysis? A systematic approach.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:affiliationInstitutes of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Erlanger Allee 101, D-07740 Jena, Germany. pascal.baltzer@med.uni-jena.delld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19523854pubmed:publicationTypeEvaluation Studieslld:pubmed